Czeck to Poland: Have New Wave of Democracy Mobilized Parties to Triumph against its National Oppositional Leaders?
Czeck's Surprise Victory over Strongmen turns out celebratory reaction from the crowd.
Czech Strongman’s
Upset Loss Shows Populists’ Vulnerability turns out the country’s oppositional parties that gathered
to join, unite, and drive out a leader poor for the country’s democracy. The New
York Times article also mentions Hungary and Poland’s ousting of national
leaders that have balked the democratic process.
The final wave of democratizations
ensued during the last decade of the 20th century which incurred dramatic
political change towards democracy. Most
significant change took place in Soviet Union, Central Europe, Eastern Europe
where countries tried to triple transform their party system, constitutional
structure, and economic systems. Democratized
nations in Eastern Europe are filled with traces of socialist past.
What has been the outcome? Mixed. Some moved towards party politics and
free markets. Greece and Hungary, for
example, developed a withy trading links with European Union and actively
cultivated support for EU membership.
Others stuck to reformed Communist parties where change occurred slowly. A shift towards democracy from formerly authoritarian
regime has turned out across the globe. Greece,
Spain, and Portugal, for example, have collapsed their former authoritarian regime
and are now part of the EU and are part of the fully functioning democratic
system. End of apartheid in South Africa
have ensued their first fully democratic election. The growing establishment of democracy has spread
out to South America (Argentina and Brazil) to Asia (Philippines and South
Korea), and to Africa (Mali, Zambia). Wave
of democratizations arises as a global trend.
Past waves of democracy have been
followed by reaction “reverse waves.” Unforeseen
obstacles may lie for countries that were formerly authoritarian or continuing as
fresh, restored democratic country.
Latin America’s early growth of democracy was followed by repressive military
regime in country after country. Growth
of democracy in early 20th century gives way to Stalin and Mussolini. Decolonized Asia and Africa bore
authoritarian regimes than functioning democracies.
Elections are the central institution
for democratic governance. Elections
also reflect the shape, way, and form democracy in many ways. Democracies are divided into 2 categories: Consensual
and Majoritarian. Majoritarian democracies concentrate greater
power in the hands of electoral majority.
U.S., Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, Sweden, Portugal, Spain are some
examples of majoritarian democracy. Hungary,
Poland, and Czeck Republic are shaped under a coalition. They fall under consensual democracies shaped
by coalitions that otherwise limit or constrain the powers of the winning party
or candidate.
Czeck prevail against the populist. Babis on the right.
Distributions of seats at higher
tiers vary across the globe. Czech
Republic runs theirs by pooling at the higher level of remainders from local
districts. Higher tiers have unallocated seats in each districts followed by division
by quota which are grouped and distributed among parties on the basis of
collected remainders from each district.
Advantageous for smaller parties, it allows them to offset the wastage
effected and produced by the dispersion of their vote in local districts.
Higher thresholds are imposed on
coalitions. Poland has natural threshold
of 7% for national seats. All other
countries require 5% or less of national regional vote. Central and Eastern Europe are divided between
the presidential system with direct elections (Russia and Ukraine) and one in
which where legislature selects the president (Hungary and Czeck
Republic).
Hungary’s system combines 176
members elected by majority in single member districts with 152 members elected
by straight PR d’Hondt in 20 regional districts rectified by supplying 58
national seats to be distributed by PR on the basis of votes cast for
candidates overcome at 2 other levels.
Poland had series of relatively
unstable coalition government during the period following the 1991 elections. New elections thereafter bored more decisive results
in part because of changes in the electoral laws that eliminate many smaller
parties. It is no surprise that even
today its own political leader would pare down on the democratic process.
Democracy is not a lasting,
tipping state but an evolving course.
Few people follow the news accounts of politics and government regularly
and only a small number in each country talk about politics. Most individual citizens are not “good
citizens.” On the other hand, democratic
process may not be workable if every person were to be active on all issues. After the Weimar Republic broke down, concerns
on effects of extra surplus of participation ensued. Democratic ways change, open, and
evolve.
Scholars believe that the model
citizen is “not the active citizen; he is potentially the active citizen.” People must believe that they can influence
the government and must be willing to make an effort if the issue holds grave
weight. Yet, few will gain this
potential. For Eastern European
countries like Czeck Republic, Hungary, and Poland, the small parties united to
prevail against leaders that have repressed their citizen’s and the country’s democracy.
Comments
Post a Comment